On the Efficiency of Some Selected Designs: A Case of Randomized Block Designs
RCBD, efficiency, missing value and estimation
Abstract
This work examines the Relative Efficiency () of some selected Randomized Complete Block Designs ().The efficiency of the selected designs showed that design was the most preferable having Mean Square Error of 6.14, followed by design with Mean Square Error of 9.11 and design with Mean Square Error of 18.08. The results from the pairwise relative efficiency of the selected designs show that (, ) = 0.34 with the smallest relative efficiency value and (, ) = 2.94 with the largest relative efficiency value. We recommended design as the best design for this particular problem since its mean square error remains the smallest.
Downloads
How to Cite
References
S Angadi, H Cutforth, B Mcconkey, Y Gan (2003) Yield Adjustment by Canola Grown at Different Plant Populations under Semiarid Conditions. 43(4), 1358-1366.
Michael Casler (2015) Spatial Variation Affects Precision of Perennial Cool‐Season Forage Grass Trials. 91(1), 75-81.
B Everitt (2002) The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics.
Shieh Gwowen (2004) The effectiveness of randomized complete block design. 58(1), 111-124.
Shazia Irum, Shagufta Parveen, Muhammad Raza, Mariyam Haroon (2009) Trend Analysis of Hepatic Infection in Pakistan. 16(3), 375-376.
Warren Kuhfeld, Randall Tobias, Mark Garratt (1994) Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications. 31(4), 545.
F Michael, Festing (2014) Randomized block experiment design can increase the power and producibility of laboratory Animal experiments.
Published
2018-03-05
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.