The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism

Authors

  • Dr. Stanislav V. Ordin

contradictions of fragments, elementary mathematics, fragmentation of Science, paradoxes, relativism, the principle of logarithmic relativity

Abstract

The lack of rigor and the resulting ambiguity of the Definition of the Magnetic Field were hidden behind a mathematization borrowed from hydrodynamics. But in both cases, ideological aspects remained unexplained, leading the very existence of the rotor used to a direct contradiction with Curie’s Theorem. And through Maxwell’s electrodynamics, this contradiction was extended into the Theory of Relativity. Thus, a formal, in-depth combing of the Basic Experiments underlying the Theory of Relativity, through modeling and a more rigorous mathematization of the Magnetic Field, proved insufficient. A refinement upwards, into the realm of the basis that defines the UNDERSTANDING of Relativism, was also required. And this view from above gives us not a polished History of Persons, but the Genesis of Scientific Ideas.

Downloads

How to Cite

The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism. (2026). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 26(A1), 17-21. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/103056

References

The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

The Dialectics of Science and Magnetism. (2026). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 26(A1), 17-21. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/103056