ASEAN Legal Mechanism in Geopolitical Conflict of the South China Sea

Authors

  • Saidatul Nadia Abd Aziz

  • Salawati Mat Basir

ASEAN, centrality, cohesion, geopolitics, south china sea

Abstract

South China Sea competition is real and hostile. Following the South China Sea Arbitration, the dynamics of territorial sovereignty in the South China Sea have shifted considerably. The position of ASEAN as the most enduring regional organization in the "global south" faces challenges, particularly in balancing rising great power competition in the Indo-Pacific region. ASEAN as a regional institution may be able to deal with some uncertainties, but it is impossible to overcome the recurrent "power dilemma," particularly when powerful states are intent on disrupting the existing quo. However, ASEAN must continue to act as an impartial arbiter in a strategic environment characterized by competing interests. ASEAN cohesion is very important and if the territorial issue is not properly managed, it might jeopardize regional stability and affect all member states. Without cohesiveness and centrality, existing ASEAN mechanisms and multilateralism can never be successful, and great powers will continue to intervene in the region's affairs.

Downloads

How to Cite

ASEAN Legal Mechanism in Geopolitical Conflict of the South China Sea. (2024). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 24(E1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJSFREVOL24IS1PG1

References

Salvador Regilme, James Parisot (2017) Introduction. 3-18.

D Mcdougall (2016) Asia Pacific in world politics.

Huma Amin, Arslan Rafique (2021) The Maritime Rise of China in Indo-Pacific and Indo-US Counter Balancing Approach. 4(1), 18.

N Son, Asean (2020) China, and the code of conduct. 24-42.

J Manicom (2016) Archipelagic sea lanes passage in Southeast Asia: Developments and uncertainties. 131-147.

T Mcdorman (2021) The territorial sovereignty disputes in the south China Sea. 91-103.

Winston Raging waters in the South China sea. What the battle for supremacy means For Southeast Asia.

S Seah, H Ha, M Martinus, P Thao The state of Southeast Asia: 2021 survey report.

S Seah, J Lin, Sithanonxay, Suvannaphaky, M Martinus, P Thao, F Seth, H Ha The state of Southeast Asia: 2022 survey report.

L Buszynski (2018) ASEAN, grand strategy, and the South China Sea: Between China and the United States. 122-146.

Mark Beeson (2022) Decentered? ASEAN's Struggle to Accommodate Great Power Competition. 2(1), 44.

Hidetaka Yoshimatsu (2019) ASEAN and Great Power Rivalry in Regionalism: From East Asia to the Indo-Pacific. 42(1), 25-44.

S Aziz (2022) Ahead of ASEAN Economic Community, Indonesia should consider economic zones at her borders.

H Thao (2001) Vietnam and the code of conduct for the South China Sea. 32(2), 105-130.

Robert Beckman, Vu Dang (2021) ASEAN and the South China Sea. 336-356.

A Panda, China (2017) ASEAN come to agreement on a framework South China Sea code of conduct.

R Winston (2013) Our Core Arguments. 3-20.

C Thayer, Asean (2020) China, and the code of conduct.

L Buszynski, Asean grand strategy. 122-146.

(2021) ASEAN leaders' declaration on upholding multilateralism.

FINAL-ASEAN-Leaders-Declaration-on-Upholding-Multil a-teralism.

R Wardahana (2021) The South China Sea Conflict and Security Cooperation in ASEAN Waters. 3(1), 23-33.

J Li (2017) 63. DISPUTES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA. 310-313.

R Winston (2014) 11. Taiwan's South China Sea Policy Revival. 223-244.

Min‐hyung Kim (2012) Why Does A Small Power Lead? ASEAN Leadership in Asia-Pacific Regionalism. 27(1), 111-134.

R Natalegawa (2017) The expansion of ASEAN and the changing dynamics of Southeast Asia. 39(2), 232-238.

Von Feigenblatt, O (2011) Avoidance and consensus building in the association of Southeast Asian States (ASEAN): The path towards a new 'ASEAN Way. 13(1), 121-138.

Richard Stubbs (2020) Debating ASEAN: a response to commentaries on 'ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents'. 33(3-4), 604-607.

A Acharya (2017) The myth of ASEAN centrality. 39(2), 273-279.

S Leelianou (2021) Does ASEAN consensus decision making remain relevant?.

S Jayakumar (1997) Opening statement by His Excellency, professor S Jayakumar minister for foreign affairs and minister for law of the republic of Singapore at the 30th ASEAN ministerial meeting 24.

J Li (2017) ASEAN and the South China Sea: Approaches to resolving the conflict. 2752.

Arabinda Acharya (2017) India and Southeast Asia in the Age of Terror: Building Partnerships for Peace. 28(2), 297-321.

Ralf Emmers, See Tan (2011) The ASEAN Regional Forum and Preventive Diplomacy: Built to Fail?. 7(1), 44-60.

Amitav Acharya (2012) The Making of Southeast Asia.

R Sukma (2009) 4. ASEAN Regional Forum: Extending the ASEAN Way in Managing Regional Order. 113-156.

S Mustaza, I Saidin (2020) ASEAN, China and the South China Sea territorial disputes: Analysis of conflict management strategies. 28(2), 577-598.

P Beng (2020) ASEAN is failing on the South China Sea issue: As China continues its militarization of the vital seaway, most Southeast Asian nations remain mired in their own problems.

S Hutagalung (2022) Indonesia takes 2023 Asean chair.

L Tong (2016) ASEAN COUNTRIES' EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES. 7-12.

R Staff (2022) Philippine senator calls for a 'claimants only' code of conduct on South China Sea.

H Amin, A Rafique The maritime rise of China in Indo-Pacific and Indo-US counter balancing approach. 4(1), 18-23.

S Aziz, S Basir (2022) South China Sea: ASEAN mechanism on maritime disputes and the rise of Indo Pacific region. 9(2), 65-82.

Donald Emmerson (2017) ASEAN between China and America: Is It Time to Try Horsing the Cow?. 5(1), 1-23.

N Son, Asean (2017) China, and the code of conduct. 5, 1-23.

Ronald Granieri (2015) What is Geopolitics and Why Does It Matter?. 59(4), 491-504.

M Huda, S Muhammad, N Kamaruddin (2020) Security community, ASEAN and its member states: Mutually reinforcing or a relationship of convenience?. 47(1), 78-97.

M Karim (2016) Should the ASEAN regional forum (ARF) revisit its core areas. 2(1), 100-119.

L Leviter (2011) 4. The ASEAN Charter: The Case for Ratification. 43, 32-43.

S Mustaza, I Saidin, Asean (2020) 63. DISPUTES IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA. 28, 310-313.

Mark Raymond, David Welch (2022) What's Really Going On in the South China Sea?. 41(2), 214-239.

D Singh (2018) Southeast Asia's uneasy position in America's Indo-Pacific strategy. 76.

H Thao (2001) Vietnam and the Code of Conduct for the South China Sea. 32(2), 105-130.

Von Feigenblatt, O (2011) Avoidance and consensus building in the association of Southeast Asian States (ASEAN): The path towards a new 'ASEAN Way. 13, 121-138.

Andy Yee (2011) Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: A Comparative Analysis of the South China Sea and the East China Sea. 40(2), 165-193.

Hidetaka Yoshimatsu (2022) ASEAN and Great Power Rivalry in Regionalism: From East Asia to the Indo-Pacific. 42(1), 25-44.

R Amer (2014) The dispute management approach of the association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): What relevance for the South China Sea situation. 47-74.

R Beckman (2014) 2. ASEAN and the South China Sea Dispute. 15-35.

R Beckman, V Dang (2021) ASEAN and the South China Sea. 336-356.

L Buszynski (2020) The South China Sea. 1-8.

A Corr, Introduction (2018) Great powers, grand strategies: The new game in the South China Sea. 1-40.

I Forsyth (2018) Old game plan, new game: China's grand strategy in the South China Sea. 74-105.

M George (2021) Maritime security and demilitarisation of the South China Sea. 65-88.

B Glosserman (2016) Can the United States share power in the Asia-Pacific. 23-40.

R Haddick (2022) Fire on the water, second edition: China, America, and the Future of the Pacific.

C Jenner (2021) Struggles for prestige and power, 960-2020. 468-485.

(2021) Routledge handbook of the South China Sea. 468-485.

Ted Mcdorman (2021) The territorial sovereignty disputes in the South China Sea. 91-103.

D Mcdougall (2016) Asia Pacific in world politics. 2.

D O' Connell (1982) The international law of the Sea. 1.

Sorpong Peou (2022) Introduction: Peace and security in Indo-Pacific Asia. 1-19.

C Schofield (2021) Competing maritime claims and enduring disputes in the South China sea. 104-122.

N Son (2020) ASEAN, China, and the code of conduct. 24-42.

R Sukma (2009) The accidental driver: ASEAN in the ASEAN regional forum. 111-123.

Carlyle Thayer, Asean (2020) ASEAN, China, and the Code of Conduct. 43-59.

S Tonnesson (2021) The South China Sea. 9-23.

H White (2012) The China choice: Why America should share power.

R Winston, I Sachdeva (2020) Raging waters in the South China sea. What the battle for supremacy means For Southeast Asia.

R Amer (2014) The South China Sea: Challenge for ASEAN.

(2013) DOCUMENTATION: Statement by Senator Gareth Evans, Australian Foreign Minister, to the ASEAN PMC 7+1 Session, on Australia, ASEAN and the East Asian Hemisphere, Bandar Seri Begawan, 2 August 1995. 12(3), 404-408.

(2016) CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT OF THE 14TH ASEAN SUMMIT "ASEAN CHARTER FOR ASEAN PEOPLES". 297-305.

Asean (2017) About the ASEAN defence ministers' meeting plus.

Premesha Saha (2019) ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific (AOIP) and the Indo-Pacific Oceans Initiative (IPOI): Complementarities, Challenges and Opportunities. 569-582.

Matiur Rahman (2021) https://bbrc.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/BBRC_Vol_14_No_05_Special-Issue_42.pdf. 14(5), 242-244.

(2022) 7. Assessing the ARF. 126-139.

Asean (2022) ADMM Plus Defence Cooperation: Rise of a New Player. 215-217.

P Beng (2020) CHINA ADJUSTS ITS SOUTH CHINA SEA POLICY. 2-5.

J Borton (2017) Islands and rocks in the South China Sea: Post-hague ruling.

B Desker (2008) https://publ.icgbio.ru/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/BGRSSB_2024_Abstracts-137-140.pdf.

C Dunst (2021) What to expect of Cambodia as ASEAN chair.

J Espena, D Gill (2020) Indonesia and Vietnam: The quest for ASEAN leadership.

F Heiduk, G Wacker (2020) From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Significance, implementation and challenges.

S Hor (2022) ASEAN policy towards the South China Sea: A neoclassical realism and two-level games analysis.

D Hutt (2021) 4. ASEAN Centrality as an Expression of ASEAN Leadership in the Region: The Philippine Chairmanship of ASEAN in 2017. 39-63.

D Hutt (2022) Has the Financial Sector Become Too Big and Dysfunctional?. 173-190.

S Jayakumar (1997) STATEMENT BY MR GEORGE YEO, MINISTER FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF SINGAPORE AND CHAIRMAN OF THE 41ST ASEAN STANDING COMMITTEE AT THE CLOSING CEREMONY OF THE 41ST ASEAN MINISTERIAL MEETING AND HANDING OVER OF THE ASEAN STANDING COMMITTEE. 291-293.

B Kausikan (2016) Asean Legal Mechanism in Geopolitical Conflict of the South China Sea Global Journal of Science Frontier Research ( E ) XXIV Issue I Version I Year.

A Kurmala, Csl Koh (2018) Session III: ASEAN-China Maritime Security Co-operation. 15-18.

C Lean (2018) ASEAN-China maritime exercise CUES greater SCS stability.

B Lippert, V Perthes (2020) Strategic rivalry between United States and China: Causes, trajectories, and implications for Europe. 4.

M Natalegawa (2018) Does ASEAN Matter? A View from Within.

H Omar (2022) Focus group discussion on military perspectives on the South China Sea conflict.

S Seah, H Ha, M Martinus, P Thao (2021) The state of Southeast Asia: 2021 survey report.

S Seah, J Lin, Sithanonxay, Suvannaphaky, M Martinus, P Thao, F Seth, H Ha (2022) Source: The state of Southeast Asia: 2022 survey report.

Shengguang (2017) Re-considering the Definition and Concept of 'Peripheral Diplomacy. 73.

W Shicun, J Colombage (2019) Indo-Pacific strategy and China's response.

J Stromseth, Don (2019) Southeast Asia in the throes of US-China rivalry.

H Thu (2018) Southeast Asians hope for neutrality, prepare for a choice.

ASEAN Legal Mechanism in Geopolitical Conflict of the South China Sea

Published

2024-07-24

How to Cite

ASEAN Legal Mechanism in Geopolitical Conflict of the South China Sea. (2024). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 24(E1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJSFREVOL24IS1PG1