Contribution of Three Sedges of Cyperus in the Rural Economy of Sundarbans, India

Anirban Roy; Sumit Manna; Sudipta Mukherjee

Authors

Anirban Roy
Sumit Manna
Sudipta Mukherjee

bioresource, rural economy, sedges, sundarbans, value chain

Abstract

Three sedges of Cyperus (C. malaccensis, C. compressus and C. iria) are used for making mats by the forest fringe people of Sunderban mangrove swamp and sale in local markets. The focus of the work is to calculate species wise net economic contribution of these sedges. Fifteen families from each four villages of two islands have been selected for qualitative and quantitative assessment of these resource use pattern through participatory observation and questionnaire method. The annual production, economic valuation of individual species were assessed through quadrat sampling (272 habitat patch) and market survey with cost benefit analysis respectively. Economic contribution of the sedges to the local people in terms of annual income is highest in case of C. malaccensis (6.638%) followed by C. compressus (1.599%) and C. iria (0.690%). The production of the three species is 5-8 times higher than paddy, thus have potentiality as alternative livelihood options.

Downloads

How to Cite

Contribution of Three Sedges of Cyperus in the Rural Economy of Sundarbans, India. (2016). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 16(11), 33-41. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/

Download Citation

References

Alexander S.J., D. Pilz, N. Weber, E. Brown, V. Rockwell (2002) Mushrooms, trees, and money: value estimates of commercial mushrooms and timber in the Pacific Northwest.

A. Banerjee (1964) Forests of Sundarban: Centanary. 166-185.

Godoy R (1993) The economic value and sustainable harvest of plants and animals from the tropical forest: Assumptions, hypotheses, and methods. 47, 220-233.

P. Bhattacharya, S. Hayat (2004) Sustainable NTFP management for rural development: a case from Madhya Pradesh, India. 6, 161-168.

Byron Arnold, M. (1999) Byron N. & Arnold M., 1999. What Futures for the People of the Tropical Forests?. 27(5), 789-805. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6VC63X5H9R5T/1/bf61a1f4c750269e58bcc1ddef8769

(2011) Census of India 2011.

K. Chakraborty (1986) Fish and fishery resources in the mangrove swamps of Sundarbans, West Bengal- an indepth study. 112, 538-542.

Charlie Sheona, S. (2004) The importance of Non-Timber Forest Products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: A review of evidence from South Africa. 100, 58-664.

A. Chaudhuri, A. Choudhury (1994) Mangroves of the Sundarbans. One.

J. Goss (1996) Introduction to focus groups. 28(2), 113-114.

John Gowdy (2007) Toward an experimental foundation for benefit-cost analysis. 63(4), 649-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.02.010

J. Grix (2004) The Foundations of Research.

J. Hector (1992) Contingent valuation at the farm gate.

Ajay Mahapatra, D. Tewari (2005) Importance of non-timber forest products in the economic valuation of dry deciduous forests of India. 7(3), 455-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.02.002

A. Mandal, R. Ghosh (1989) Sundarbans: A Socio-bio- Ecological Study.

Manna S, Roy A, Ghara T (2012) Mangrove community in an abandoned crick kiln: A structural and association analysis. 6, 24-31.

Sumit Manna, Anirban Roy (2013) Economic contribution of wild edible mushrooms to a forest fringe ethnic community in some eastern lateritic parts of India. 19(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-013-0411-4

C. Marshall, G. Rossman (1999) Designing Qualitative Research Sage Thousand Oaks.

K. Naskar, Guha Bakshi, D. (1982) R., Guha Bakshi D N., 1982: Sundarbans - the world famous mangrove forests of the District 24- Parganas in West Bengal. 3, 883-918.

Charles Peters, Alwyn Gentry, Robert Mendelsohn (1989) Valuation of an Amazonian rainforest. 339(6227), 655-656. https://doi.org/10.1038/339655a0

(2011) 17.

Anshu Singh, Prodyut Bhattacharya, Pradeep Vyas, Sarvashish Roy (2010) Contribution of NTFPs in the Livelihood of Mangrove Forest Dwellers of Sundarban. 29(3), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2010.11906263