On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences

Authors

  • C. Y. Lo

controversies; nobel prize; errors; influences, suggestions

Abstract

The Nobel Prizes were established by Alfred Bernhard Nobel for those who confer the "greatest benefit on mankind", and specifically in physics, chemistry, peace, physiology or medicine, and literature. In 1968 the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was established. However, the proceedings, nominations, awards, and exclusions have generated criticism and controversy. The controversies and influences related to the Nobel Physics Prize are discussed. The 1993 Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Hulse and Taylor, but the related theory was still incorrect as Gullstrand conjectured. The fact that Christodoulou received honors for related errors testified, "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth" as Einstein asserted. The strategy based on the recognition time lag failed because of mathematical and logical errors. These errors were also the obstacles for later crucial progress. Also, it may be necessary to do follow up work after the awards years later since an awarded work may still be inadequately understood. Thus, it is suggested: 1) To implement the demands of Nobel's will, the Nobel Committee should rectify their past errors in sciences. 2

How to Cite

On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences. (2013). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 13(19), 59-73. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/

References

Y. Lo (1993) Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications in General Relativity. 13-16.

(1993) The Press Release of the Nobel Prize Committee (The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, 1993).

A. Gullstrand (1921) ibid, Ark.

C. Lo (1995) Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation. 455, 421. https://doi.org/10.1086/176590

C. Lo (2000) 13(4), 527-539.

C. Lo (2006) (DOI ). 306, 205-215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10509-006-9221-x

C. Lo, Linearization Equation (2011) Press Release of the Nobel Prize in Physics. 8, 354-362.

C. Lo (2012) Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences, an analysis of collectively formed errors in physics. 12.

C. Lo (2013) GJSFR Volume 13-A Issue 2 Version 1.

Sean Carroll (2003) Spacetime and Geometry.

Christodoulou, S. Klainerman (1993) The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space.

R. Wald (1984) General Relativity (The Univ.

C. Misner, K. Thorne, J. Wheeler (1973) Gravitation (Freeman, San Francisco, 1973).

Hooft (1999) A CONFONTATION WITH INFINITY.

C. Lo (2012) The Invalid Speculation of m = E/c2, the Reissner-Nordstrom Metric, and Einstein's Unification. 25(1), 49-56.

C. Lo (1997) Astrophys. 477, 700-704.

C. Lo Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics. 25. https://doi.org/10.52710/bpas-phy

C. Lo (2007) 16(3), 635-639.

C. Lo (2010) Rectifiable Inconsistencies and Related Problems in General Relativity. 23(2), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.4006/1.3359739

C. Lo (2009) A Counter Example of Einstein's Covariance Principle, 16th Annual Natural Philosophy Alliance Conference, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

C. Lo Precession Formulas for Gravity Probe-B and its Complementary Experiment of Local Light Speeds, Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences, 28D.

C. Lo (2006) On Interpretations of Hubble's Law and the Bending of Light. 1, 10-13.

C. Lo (2003) On Criticisms of Einstein's Equivalence Principle, Phys. 16(1), 84-100.

J. Frank, Tipler (2009) Is the Physics Nobel Prize Also Becoming a Joke?.

C. Lo (2006) Space, Time, Gravitation.

C. Lo Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics. 27. https://doi.org/10.52710/bpas-phy

C. Lo (2000) 13(1), 109-120.

Perlick Volker (1996) 827, 323.

C. Lo (2006) Completing Einstein's Proof of E = mc2. 4, 14-18.

C. Lo (2005) 18(4), 547-560.

C. Lo (2010) 23(3), 491-499.

S. Weinberg (2000) The Quantum Theory of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000).

C. Yang, R. Mills (1954) 96, 191.

Ron Shaw, Ph. D. thesis, Cambridge University (1955)

Zhou Pei-yuan (1987) Further Experiments to Test Einstein's Theory of Gravitation. 110-116.

C. Lo (2007) Einstein's Principle of Equivalence, and the Einstein-Minkowski Condition. (2), 73-88.

A. Whitehead (1962) The Principle of Relativity (Cambridge Univ.

C. Lo (2006) Progress in Phys. 1, 10-13.

J. Whitrow (1972) Edwin Powell Hubble. 5, 532.

J. Jackson (1962) Classical Electrodynamics.

K. Thorne (1994) Black Holes and Time Warps (Norton, New York, 1994), p. 105.

A. Einstein (1922) The Meaning of Relativity.

C. Lo, C. Wong (2006) 25D(2), 109-117.

M. Ph, Kanarev Ph. M. Kanarev, Errors by the Nobel Committee.

C. Lo Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences- Physics. 26. https://doi.org/10.52710/bpas-phy

C. Lo (2008) 21(1), 44-51.

C. Lo (2009) The Mass-Charge Repulsive Force and Space-Probes Pioneer Anomaly. 6-9.

G. Slava, Turyshev, T. Viktor, Toth (2009) Turyshev, Viktor T. 148(1-4), 149-167.

C. Lo (2012) On the Weight Reduction of Metals due to Temperature Increments. 12.

A. Einstein (1946) ' in Ideas and Opinions (Crown. 337-341.

W. Pauli (1971) Theory of Relativity (Pergamon Press, London, 1971).

A. Einstein, H. Lorentz, H. Minkowski, H. Weyl (1952) The Principle of Relativity (Dover, New York, 1952).

C. Lo (2009) 22(4), 543-546.

S. Weinberg (1972) Gravitation and Cosmology (John Wiley, New York, 1972).

C. Lo (1999) 12(3), 508-526.

A. Lorentz (1900) Proc. K. Ak. Amsterdam. 8, 603.

Hans Ohanian, Remo Ruffini (1994) Gravitation and Spacetime. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139003391

M. Born (1968) The Born-Einstein Letters. 125.

A. Einstein, N. Rosen (1937) 223, 43.

A. Einstein, C. Lo (2012) Local Lorentz Invariance and the Distortion of Einstein's Equivalence Principle. 35, 898-65.

L. Synge (1971) Relativity: The General Theory (North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1971), pp. IX-X.

C. Will (1986) Was Einstein Right?. 20.

V. Fock (1964) The Theory of Space Time and Gravitation (Pergamon Press, 1964).

Doyle Buehler (2004) (2), 1-22.

C. Lo (2012) 25(1), 49-56.

Burton Richter (2006) Theory in particle physics: Theological speculation versus practical knowledge. 59(10), 8-9.

On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences

Published

2013-04-26

How to Cite

On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies, and Influences. (2013). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 13(19), 59-73. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/