Comparative Study of Three Clustering Algorithms for Microarray Data

Authors

  • Dicky John Davis G

  • Noveenaa Pious

hierarchical clustering; k-means clustering; fuzzy clustering; differentially expressed genes; microarray data

Abstract

High throughput genomic data analysis is becoming an increasingly integral part of biomedical research. The information derived from gene expression analysis helps in diagnosing the treatment modality given to the patient. However, the amount of data is humongous and becomes complex to examine manually. Unsupervised machine learning algorithms perform complex tasks on an unlabelled data by clustering to comprehend the underlying structure and behaviour of the pattern. Clustering microarray data, examines the differential expressed genes found by grouping the genes based on the similarity of the expression values. In this study, we propose to elucidate the best clustering algorithm for gene expression data on various clinical conditions. The proposed study was carried on three gene expression datasets of Severe acute respiratory syndrome, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease. Differentially expressed genes were found at three p-values 0.01, 0.05, 0.001 and the most significant number of genes were retrieved at p-value 0.05. We experimented the differential expressed genes on three clustering algorithms, namely Hierarchical clustering, k-means clustering and fuzzy clustering of the three diseases. The performance of the three clustering algorithms was evaluated using the internal validity index, wherein Hierarchical clustering was found to be best for gene expression data.

Downloads

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Three Clustering Algorithms for Microarray Data. (2022). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 22(G1), 11-17. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/3092

References

Henrik Bengtsson, Ola Hössjer (2006) Methodological study of affine transformations of gene expression data with proposed robust non-parametric multi-dimensional normalization method. 7(1).

Camilla Bernardini, Federica Censi, Wanda Lattanzi, Marta Barba, Giovanni Calcagnini, Alessandro Giuliani, Giorgio Tasca, Mario Sabatelli, Enzo Ricci, Fabrizio Michetti (2013) Mitochondrial Network Genes in the Skeletal Muscle of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients. 8(2), e57739.

Xiangqin Cui, M Kerr, Gary Churchill (2003) Transformations for cDNA Microarray Data. 2(1).

E Gr�nblatt, S Mandel, J Jacob-Hirsch, S Zeligson, N Amariglo, G Rechavi, J Li, R Ravid, W Roggendorf, P Riederer, M Youdim (2004) Gene expression profiling of parkinsonian substantia nigra pars compacta; alterations in ubiquitin-proteasome, heat shock protein, iron and oxidative stress regulated proteins, cell adhesion/cellular matrix and vesicle trafficking genes. 111(12), 1543-1573.

Renji Reghunathan, Manikandan Jayapal, Li-Yang Hsu, Hiok-Hee Chng, Dessmon Tai, Bernard Leung, Alirio Melendez (2005) Expression profile of immune response genes in patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome. 6(1).

Raul Rodriguez-Esteban, Xiaoyu Jiang (2017) Differential gene expression in disease: a comparison between high-throughput studies and the literature. 10(1), 1-10.

Peter Rousseeuw (1987) Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. 20(C), 53-65.

Christine Steinhoff, Martin Vingron (2006) Normalization and quantification of differential expression in gene expression microarrays. 7(2), 166-177.

Adi Tarca, Roberto Romero, Sorin Draghici (2006) Analysis of microarray experiments of gene expression profiling. 195(2), 373-388.

Anbupalam Thalamuthu, Indranil Mukhopadhyay, Xiaojing Zheng, George Tseng (2006) Evaluation and comparison of gene clustering methods in microarray analysis. 22(19), 2405-2412.

Comparative Study of Three Clustering Algorithms for Microarray Data

Published

2022-05-14

How to Cite

Comparative Study of Three Clustering Algorithms for Microarray Data. (2022). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 22(G1), 11-17. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/3092