Landing Trends, Species Composition and Percentage Composition of Sharks and Rays in Chittagong and Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh
shark, ray, species composition, elasmobranches fishery, landing trend, catch data, abundance, percent contribution
Abstract
The study was conducted from April, 2006 to June, 2010 on landing trends, species composition and percent contribution of sharks and rays by weight using the catch records of Marine Fisheries Survey Management Unit, Chittagong from two landing centers Fishery ghat, Chittagong and BFDC ghat, Cox's Bazar. This study identified 27 species in total representing 11 species of shark (04 families) and 16 species of ray (09 families). The highest landing volume (134 MT) and contribution (76%) to total catch for the whole sampling period was found from Scoliodon laticaudus followed by Rhizoprionodon acutus (108 MT or 55%), Carcharhinus melanopterus (75 MT or 38%), Sphyrna zygaena (49 MT or 26%), Chiloscyllium indicum (38 MT or 20%), Eusphyra blochii (22 MT or 11%) Galeocerdo cuvier (21 MT or 10%) and other (03 MT or 2%). Species which occurred least were placed in the 'other' category comprising Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos, Stegostoma fasciatum, Carcharhinus leucas and C. falcifomis. Among rays, the landing volume and resultant percent contribution to overall catch found highest from Himantura uarnak (219 MT, 120%), followed by Himantura walga (158 MT or 60%), Himantura bleekeri (68 MT or 34%), Rhinobatos granulatus (29 MT or 18%), Gymnura micrura (12 MT or 7%) Mobula diabolus (11 MT or 5%), Rhynchobatus djiddensis (10 MT or 5%), Aetomylaeus nichofii (9 MT or 4%), Rhinoptera javanica (8 MT or 4%) and Narcine timlei (7 MT or 4%) and other species with least occurrence (5 MT or 4%). Species in other category consisted of Gymnura poecilura, Rhina ancylostoma, Himatura gerrardi, Anoxypristis cuspidata, Himantura undulata and Taeniura. Sps. Landing of different species were found to vary from month to month and year to year throughout the sampling period. To make absolute comment regarding these trends of occurrence, base line biological information together with long term catch record for size distribution was needed which could not be work out from the present data set. However, total landing of sharks and rays were found to be on slight decline.
Downloads
- Article PDF
- TEI XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- Lens* NISO JATS XML (Beta by AI)
- HTML Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- DBK XML Kaleidoscope (download in zip)* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX pdf Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- EPUB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- MD Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- FO Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- BIB Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
- LaTeX Kaleidoscope* (Beta by AI)
How to Cite
References
A. Ahmad, A. Rosidi, A. Solahuddin (1999) Ahmad, A., Rosidi, A., and Solahuddin, A. R., 1999. Elasmobranch Fishery, Research and Conservation in Malaysia. 1999, 92.
C. Albert, A. Ahmad, L. Annie (2007) Field Guide to Sharks and Rays of Malaysia and Neighboring countries.
S. Cook (1980) Trends in shark fin market 1980, 1990 and beyond Chondros. 2(1), 3-6.
T. Cantor (1849) Catalogue of Malaysia Fishes. 18(2), 983.
Day (1978) The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh waters of India, Burma, and Ceylon. 730-740.
P. Devadoss, S. Vivekanandan, Rage, G. Mathew, S. Chandrasekhar (1997) Elasmobranchs resources of India, M. S. submitted.
FAO (1984) Species Identification Sheets, Fishing Area- 51. 1-15.
Fisheies Bangladesh (2008) Fisheies Statistical Book of Bangladesh. 2010.
G. Halder (2010) National Plan of Action for Shark Fisheries in Bangladesh. 122.
M. Hussain (1970) The Marine and Estuarine Fishes of North East part of the Bay of Bengal. 502.
F. Hanfee (1998) Management of Shark Fisheries in two Indian Coastal State: Tamil Nadu and Kerala. http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/003/X2097E/X2097E14.htm
IUCN (2000) The threatened fishes of Bangladesh.
P. James, P. Pillai (1987) A review of national tuna fishery of India. 4-8.
P. James (1973) Sharks, Skates and Rays as a potential fishery resource off the east coast of India. 1-14. http://eprints.cmfri.org.in/2734/1/Article_35.pdf.Acc-essed26
Y. Kazunari, A. Ahmad, C. Albert, A. Idris, A. Solahuddin, Z. Aznan (2007) Kazunari, Y., Ahmad, A., Albert, C.
P. Millington (1981) The Taiwanese gillnet fishery in the Australian Fishing Zone: A preliminary analysis of the first year's operation Department of primary Industry. 119-120.
I. Munro (1982) The Marine and Fresh Water Fishes of Ceylon Department of External Affairs Comulla, Australia. 1, 1-17.
J. Pepperell (1992) Trends in the distribution, species composition and size of sharks caught by Gamefish Anglers off south-eastern Australia, 1961- 90 Aust J Mar. 43(1), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1071/mf9920213
M. Quddus, M. Sarkar, A. Banerjee (1988) Studies of the Chondrichthyes Fauna (Sharks, Skates and Rays) of the Bay of Bengal The Journal of Noamii vol 5, No. 2, 19-23.
A. Rahman, S. Kabir, M. Ahmad, A. Ahmed, Z. Ahmed, Z. Begum (2009) Encyclopedia of Flora and Fauna of Bangladesh. 24, 485.
S. Raje, S. Sivakami, G. Moharaj, K. Manoj, A. Raju, K. Joshi (2007) An Atlas on the lasmobranch fishery resources of India.
B. Ramon (1994) Overview of world elasmobranch fisheries. 106.
B. Roy, M. Dey, M. Alam, N. Singha (2007) Present Status of Shark Fishing in the Marine Water of Bangladesh. http://www.cms.int/bodies/meetings/regional/sh-arks/pdf_docs/Inf_10_Bangladesh_Presentation_on_Shark_Fishing.pdf
J. Scott (1959) An introduction to the Sea fishes of Malaysia.
K. Sivasubramaniam (1987) Some observations on the tuna fisheries in the Indian Ocean, particularly in the central equatorial sub-region. 4-8.
T. White, M. Khan (1984) Marine Fisheries Resources Survey Demersal Trawling. 3-13.
Published
2014-04-15
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Authors and Global Journals Private Limited

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.