Effect of Intercrop Row Arrangement on Maize and Haricot Bean Productivityand the Residual Soil

Authors

  • Tamiru Hirpa

grain yield; lAI; LER; kernel; row ratio; total soil n

Abstract

On farm studies were conducted to determine the effects of intercrop row arrangements on the performances of maize (Zea mays L.) and haricot bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) crops and the residual soil at Hallabaand Tabaareas, southern Ethiopia. The result revealed that there were significant differences among the cropping patterns on growth and yield components of both crops. Grain yield of the maize crop was observed to be the highest insole stand, which was statistically at par with the maize grown in 1:1 ratio with haricot bean. There was 15.5% yield reduction in maize when the number of haricot bean rows introduced between two maize rows increased from one to three, attributable to aggravation of interspecific competition in the latter case. In the case of haricot bean crop, compared to the sole stand intercropping of one, two and three rows of haricot bean between two rows of maize had resulted in yield reductions of 56, 44.5 and 28.2%, respectively. Evaluation of the land use efficiency of the system in terms of land equivalent ratio (LER) has, however, showed improvement across the cropping pattern, where by 1:3 maize-haricot bean row ratio gave the highest land use efficiency value, 54% more efficient than growing both crops in sole stand. Total N content of the residual soil has also showed significant improvement due to the introduction of the leguminous haricot bean into the cropping system. In contrast, sole maze stands had contributed the least in amending the acidity problem of the experimental soils.

How to Cite

Effect of Intercrop Row Arrangement on Maize and Haricot Bean Productivityand the Residual Soil. (2014). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14(14), 27-34. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/

References

P. Adetiloye, F. Ezedinma, B. Okigbo (1983) A land equivalent coefficient (LEC) concept for the evaluation of competitive and productive interactions in simple to complex crop mixtures. 19(1), 27-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(83)90068-6

Adhikary S, Bagchi DK, Ghosal P, Banerjee RN, Chattkrjee BN (1991) Studies on Maize‐Legume Intercropping and their Residual Effects on Soil Fertility Status and Succeeding Crop in Upland Situation. 167(5), 289-293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037x.1991.tb00959.x

Myaka Adu-GyamfiJJ, Odgaard Sakala WD, Hogh-Jensen VesteragerJM (2007) Biological nitrogen fixation and nitrogen and phosphorus budgets in farmer-managed intercrops of maize-pigeonpea in semi-arid southern and eastern Africa. 295(1-2), 127-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9270-0

Emw Akunda (2001) Improving Food Production by Understanding the Effects of Intercropping and Plant Population on Soybean Nitrogen Fixing Attributes. 6(4), 110-115. https://doi.org/10.4314/jfta.v6i4.19300

Anil, Park, Phipps, Miller (1998) Temperate intercropping of cereals for forage: a review of the potential for growth and utilization with particular reference to the UK. 53(4), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.00144.x

Ciarlo Ariel, O. Eduardo, Lidia BenitoGE (2013) Effects of Two Plant Arrangements in Corn (Zea Mays L.) And Soybean (Glycine Max L. Merrill) Intercropping on Soil Nitrogen and Phosphorus Status and Growth of Component Crops at an Argentinean Argiudoll. 1(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20130102.11

P. Bankin (1996) Evaluation of wheat (Triticumsesdvum) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series system. 176, 289-294.

P. Banik, D. Bagchi (1993) Evaluation of rice (Oryza sativa) and legume intercropping in upland situation 19.

GC (2014) Productivity of maize (Zea Mays) basedintercropping system during Kharifseason under red and lateritic tract of west Bengal. 9(1), 31-35.

Morgado LB, Willey RW (2008) Optimum plant population for maize-bean intercropping system in the Brazilian semi-arid region. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba. 65(5), 474-480.

Kwambai Ndung'u KW, Omollo Barkutwo J, Mulati KamidiM (2005) Effect of maize and bean spatial arrangements on bean yields in north rift Kenya. 7, 1211-1215.

Odhiambo GD, Ariga ES (2001) Effect of intercropping maize and beans on striga incidence and grain yield. 7, 183-186.

Ossom EM, Rhykerd L (2007) Effect of corn (Zea mays L.) and grain legume associations on soil mineral nutrient concentration, soil temperature, crop yield, land equivalent ratio and gross income in Swaziland. 8, 225-230.

R. Prasad, R. Brook (2005) EFFECT OF VARYING MAIZE DENSITIES ON INTERCROPPED MAIZE AND SOYBEAN IN NEPAL. 41(3), 365-382. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0014479705002693

E. Paul, R. Kucey (1981) Carbon flow in microbial associations. 213, 473-478.

T. Silwana, E. Lucas (2002) The effect of planting combinations and weeding on the growth and yield of component crops of maize/bean and maize/pumpkin intercrops. 138, 193-200.

Anthony Szumigalski, Rene Van Acker (2006) Nitrogen yield and land use efficiency in annual sole crops and intercrops. Agron. 98(4), 1030-1040. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0277

Uwahdf UndiesUL, E. Attoe (2012) Effect of Intercropping and crop arrangement on yield and productivity of late season maize/soybean mixtures in the humid environment of southern Nigeria. 4(4), 37-50.

J. Vandermeer (1989) The ecology of intercropping.

Q. Zama, M. Malik (2000) Ricebean (Vignaumbellata) productivity under various maizericebean intercropping systems. 2(3), 255-257.

Effect of Intercrop Row Arrangement on Maize and Haricot Bean Productivityand the Residual Soil

Published

2014-04-15

How to Cite

Effect of Intercrop Row Arrangement on Maize and Haricot Bean Productivityand the Residual Soil. (2014). Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14(14), 27-34. https://journalofscience.org/index.php/GJSFR/article/view/